In primul rand doresc sa multumesc administratiei pentru acest spatiu acordat mesajelor mele...

Am citit cu atentie ceea ce ai scris la primul mesaj de aici, de acord cu exceptia bibliografiei in limba engleza; asa cum stiti, limba engleza a devenit si este absolut necesara pentru a aprofunda la un nivel ridicat orice subiect ce tine de fizica particulelor/fizica cuantica.

Intotdeauna introduc material amplu bibliografic in limba engleza la mesajele mele, pentru a arata clar care sunt argumentele de care vom avea nevoie pentru a afla mai multe informatii re: subiectul discutat.

Cred ca pana acum am postat doar citate relevante si de exceptie...

Teoria relativitatii (special si general) este absolut falsa; vom investiga in continuare documentatia necesara pentru a intelege acest lucru. Transistorul a fost inventat de N. Tesla, si are foarte putin de a face cu mecanica cuantica, inventata ad-hoc pentru a ascunde adevarul despre teoria aetherului.

Radiatia din ether observata de Chadwick ESTE de fapt neutronul...in 1939 L. Meitner, O. Hahn si F. Strassmann au facut o mare greseala; fenomenul de low energy metal transmutation, observat chiar din sec. XVIII de multi chimisti si fizicieni, este ceea ce explica asa numita nuclear fission (am sa revin pe acest subiect, si voi explica cum functioneaza de fapt un reactor nuclear, care nu este nici mai mult nici mai putin decat un acumulator gigantic de ether gen Reich/Tesla, voi explica experimentul lui Reich in care acesta a descoperit secretul secretelor din spatele energiei nucleare, pentru care a si fost arestat de guvernul american).

Cateva cuvinte pentru Harap Alb...esti un om de talent (eu recunosc valoarea acolo unde exista), dar nu cunosti si nici nu poti afla, de la nivelul la care te afli in prezent, raspunsurile la intrebarile fundamentale din fizica; trebuie sa ajungi la nivel de geniu (N. Tesla, V. Schauberger, C. Krafft, D. Larson), si sa ai capacitatea de a discerne intre informatii/teorii false si cele adevarate. Nu ma asteptam la asa o iesire necontrolata, mai ales dat fiind faptul ca nu esti in stare sa scrii macar cateva randuri din mesajele mele; pentru informatiile tale stimabile, eu stiu bine de tot si la modul cel mai sigur ce postez si ce scriu, daca includ copy & paste in mesaje, acesta este de nivel bibliografic, si intotdeauna cele mai formidabile si cele mai deosebite informatii, pe care altfel, nu le vei afla niciodata...

Deci, cer intelegere pe tema bibliografie in limba engleza...

Mai intai, sa intelegem cum a fost introdus in fizica conceptul de timp...

G. Riemann a introdus (1854 - disertatia originala pe:

http://www.maths.tcd.ie/pub/HistMath/People/Riemann/Geom/WKCGeom.html ) conceptul de n-dimensional geometry pentru a facilita reprezentarea geometrica a functiilor de o variabila complexa (in special logarithm branch cut). 'Such researches have become a necessity for many parts of mathematics, e.g., for the treatment of many-valued analytical functions.'

In nici un caz nu s-a gandit sa introduca timpul ca pe o noua variabila.

In contrast Riemann’s original non-Euclidian geometry dealt solely with space and was therefore an “amorphous continuum.” Einstein and Minkowski made it metric.

Minkowski's four-dimensional space was transformed by using an imaginary (√-1.ct ) term in place of the real time ( t ). So the coordinates of Minkowski's Four-Dimensional Continuum, ( x1, x2, x3, x4 ) are all treated as space coordinates, but were in fact originally ( x1, x2, x3, t ) or rather ( x1, x2, x3,√-1.ct ), therefore the 4th space dimension x4 is in fact the imaginary √-1.ct substitute. This imaginary 4-dimensional union of time and space was termed by Minkowski as 'world'. Einstein called it 'Spacetime Continuum'. In fact, Minkowski never meant it to be used in curved space. His 4th dimension was meant to be Euclidean dimensions (straight), because it was well before the introduction of General Relativity. Einstein forcibly adopted it for 'curved' or 'None Euclidean' measurements without giving a word of explanations why he could do it. In fact, if there was an explanation Einstein would have given it. Yet, this was how 'Time' became 'Space' or '4th dimensional space' for mathematical purpose, which was then used in 'Spacetime Curvature', 'Ripples of Spacetime' and other applications in General Relativity, relativistic gravitation, which then went on to become Black Hole, etc., ...

'If Michelson-Morley is wrong, then relativity is wrong' (Einstein: The Life and Times, p. 106).

If the velocity of light is only a tiny bit dependent on the velocity of the light source, then my whole theory of Relativity and Gravitation is false.' {Quotation of A. Einstein from a letter to Erwin Finley-Freundlich: August 1913}

Ce este timpul de fapt:

**Tesla underlined that time was a mere man-made reference used for convenience and as such the idea of a 'curved space-time' was delusional, hence there was no basis for the Relativistic 'space-time' binomium concept.**

Motion through space produces the 'illusion of time'.

He considered time as a mere man-made 'measure' of the rate at which events occur such as a distance travelled (in miles or kms) in a certain period of time, for a frame of reference. He considered the 'curving' of space to be absurd (putting it in gentle terms) saying that if a moving body curved space the 'equal and opposite' reaction of space on the body would 'straighten space back out'.Nu exista timp in ether/aether, de aceea conceptul de spatiu-timp, sau space-time curvature este atat de eronat.

Mai departe.

Cartea formidabila care ofera toate detaliile necesare pentru a intelege falsitatea absoluta a formulei E=mc2, precum si erorile din teoria propusa de Einstein.

http://users.net.yu/~mrp/index.htmlhttp://users.net.yu/~mrp/contents.htmlhttp://users.net.yu/~mrp/chapter26.html#4http://users.net.yu/~mrp/chapter28.htmlhttp://users.net.yu/~mrp/chapter23.html#7Erorile/greselile lui A. Einstein:

http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/dp5/relativ.htm http://blog.hasslberger.com/2006/03/relativity_fraud_the_complicit.htmlhttp://www.aquestionoftime.com/lorentz.htmhttp://users.net.yu/~mrp/chapter20.htmlhttp://hometown.aol.com/thomasaquinas87/origins/pdf/einstein.pdf lucrarea extraordinara care expune erorile din gandirea lui Einstein

(other valuable information, black holes, quasars, variable speed of light)

http://www.kevin.harkess.btinternet.co.uk/reasons_einstein_wrong/reasons_einstein_wrong.html http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/dp5/relativ.htm http://www.csmonitor.com/2003/0130/p14s03-bogn.html http://superstringtheory.com/forum/relboard/messages12/103.html http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/dp5/relativ.htm#rel3 http://www.topology.org/sci/grav.html (un site senzational)

http://www.reformation.org/einstein-unmasked.htmlhttp://homepage.ntlworld.com/academ/whatswrongwithrelativity.htmlhttp://einstein52.tripod.com/alberteinsteinprophetorplagiarist/id9.htmlhttp://www.collectmyflock.com/CollectMyFlock/pages/20--00__THE_DECEIVER_ALBERT_EINSTEIN__3--PART_SERIES__0 00.html (supersite)

http://uk.geocities.com/kevinharkess/reasons_einstein_wrong/reasons_einstein_wrong.htmleinsteinfiles

http://itis.volta.alessandria.it/episteme/ep6/ep6-bjerk-rec.htmhttp://nptbs.airweb.net/GR-HR.docUniversul Stationar/Erorile lui E. Hubble/Red Shift Errors

http://www.ldolphin.org/univ-age.html http://www.ldolphin.org/staticu.htmlhttp://www.topology.org/sci/grav.html Voi reveni in curand si cu greseala inimaginabila facuta de E. Hubble, care a interpretat redshift din punctul de vedere al efectului Doppler...

Nikola Tesla despre conceptul eronat de space-time-curvature:

... Supposing that the bodies act upon the surrounding space causing curving of the same, it appears to my simple mind that the curved spaces must react on the bodies, and producing the opposite effects, straightening out the curves. Since action and reaction are coexistent, it follows that the supposed curvature of space is entirely impossible - But even if it existed it would not explain the motions of the bodies as observed. Only the existence of a field of force can account for the motions of the bodies as observed, and its assumption dispenses with space curvature. All literature on this subject is futile and destined to oblivion. So are all attempts to explain the workings of the universe without recognizing the existence of the ether and the indispensable function it plays in the phenomena.'

'My second discovery was of a physical truth of the greatest importance. As I have searched the entire scientific records in more than a half dozen languages for a long time without finding the least anticipation, I consider myself the original discoverer of this truth, which can be expressed by the statement: There is no energy in matter other than that received from the environment.' — Nikola Tesla

At the age of 81, Tesla challenged Einstein's theory of relativity, announcing that he was working on a dynamic theory of gravity that would do away with the calculation of space curvature.

http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtopic=18715&st=15http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=11347&highlight=&sid=97cdb35b7032aaec613f1cfbe0bbcde5 supersupersite

http://www.cheniere.org/books/part3/notes.htm (new electromagnetics)

http://members.tripod.com/lyne4lyne/tesla.htmether quotes

http://www.svpvril.com/Cosmology/addendum3.htmlDuring the succeeding two years of intense concentration I was fortunate enough to make two far-reaching discoveries. The first was a dynamic theory of gravity, which I have worked out in all details and hope to give to the world very soon. It explains the causes of this force and the motions of heavenly bodies under its influence so satisfactorily that it will put an end to idle speculations and false conceptions, as that of curved space. According to the relativists, space has a tendency to curvature owing to an inherent property or presence of celestial bodies. Granting a semblance of reality to this fantastic idea, it is still self-contradictory. Every action is accompanied by an equivalent reaction and the effects of the latter are directly opposite to those of the former. Supposing that the bodies act upon the surrounding space causing curvature of the same, it appears to my simple mind that the curved spaces must react on the bodies and, producing the opposite effects, straighten out the curves, Since action and reaction are coexistent, it follows that the supposed curvature of space is entirely impossible.

http://www.rastko.org.yu/rastko/delo/10902Speaking to his friends, Tesla often refuted some of Einstein’s statements, especially those which were related with curvature of space. He considered that it breaks the law of action and opposite reaction: “If curvature of space is formed due to strong gravitational fields, then it should become straight due to opposite reaction.”

http://blog.hasslberger.com/2007/04/teslas_creative_genius_intuiti.htmlWas Einstein wrong about Special Relativity?

http://www.johnpeckscience.com/http://www.brojon.org/frontpage/EINSTEIN-WENT-WRONG.htmlhttp://www.wbabin.net/valev/valev5.htmhttp://blog.hasslberger.com/2006/05/tweaking_einstein_unified_theo.htmlhttp://homepage.ntlworld.com/academ/whatswrongwithrelativity.htmlhttp://www.physicsmyths.org.uk/relativity.htmEinstein's Misconceptions of Space and Time

Many notable scientists such as the French mathematician, Henri Poincare rejected Einstein’s Theory of Relativity due to it’s lack of sound mathematical procedures, absence of clearness of vision or rigorous arguments.

supersite

http://www.aethro-kinematics.com/http://blog.hasslberger.com/2007/06/einstein_warped_minds_bent_tru.htmlAlte greseli din special theory of relativity:

http://www.helmut-hille.de/units.htmlhttp://www.wbabin.net/science/mueller.pdfhttp://www.aetheoraem.com/Contemporary.htm (supersite)

http://www.catholicintl.com/scienceissues/critique-dermott3.htmH. Dingle critique of special relativity:

http://www.heretical.com/science/dingle1.htmlhttp://www.suppressedscience.net/physics.htmlCum sunt eliminate din sistemul universitar orice critici la adresa teoriei relativitatii...vezi sectiunea dedicata teoriei relativitatii...